Should the USDA Regulate Animal Shelters and Rescue Groups?

June 20, 2018

In April, The Washington Post ran a story saying that 86 “rescue and advocacy groups” had been purchasing dogs and puppies at auctions.  The Post reported that since 2009, these groups have spent $2.68 million buying 5,761 dogs.  Needless to say, this story created a fury within the pet community and raised such questions as:

  • “What? Are there not enough dogs that need new forever homes available that these groups needed to purchase some to re-home?”
  • “Wait a minute, aren’t these groups the ones who argue “Adopt, Don’t Shop” when it comes to pets?”
  • “Maybe $2.68 million isn’t enough money to support all the homeless pets around, but it sure could buy a lot of dog food!” (Ok, that’s not a question).

Part of the reason these groups might have gone to auctions may be the success of the shelter system and the rescue groups themselves.  There are simply less commercial kennels in the United States than there used to be, there are less dogs in shelters, AND, more importantly, less shelter pets being euthanized.  This smaller population makes it harder for rescue groups (especially those dedicated to a specific breed) to find dogs in shelters (unless your rescue group happens to focus on Pit Bulls or Chihuahuas, as there are always plenty of those in shelters).

In response to the Washington Post’s story, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a bulletin that led with the following:

Are you an individual, business, or non-profit organization that buys, sells, adopts or transports dogs? If so, you may need to obtain a USDA license or registration so our inspectors can ensure you are humanely caring, treating, handling, and transporting your animals according to the regulations and standards outlined in the Animal Welfare Act.

The USDA bulletin caused a bit of a ruckus in the “for profit” pet world.  An editorial in Pet Business asserted “[t]he time has come to stop assuming that all rescue groups, shelters, and humane societies are inherently a positive in the life of pets.”  The editorial called for the regulation of rescue groups.

All of this got us thinking; does this mean our San Francisco City Shelter requires (or should require) a USDA permit?  How about the San Francisco SPCA?  How about the myriad of rescue groups that operate in San Francisco?  What about Pet Camp and the Pet Camp Express?

We think the answer is “no” for San Francisco Animal Care and Control, as USDA says that those “operating a pound or shelter (or a business under contract with a pound or shelter) under the jurisdiction of a state, county, municipality, township or city (including government -operated and government -contract shelters) do not require a USDA permit.”

Thankfully, USDA also says that Pet Camp doesn’t need a permit for the Pet Camp Express since the transportation is only to or from Pet Camp for day or overnight care.

We’re less confident about SF-SPCA and the rescue groups that operate here and elsewhere.  The USDA asserts that “compensation” in the Animal Welfare Act includes “adoption fees, donations, or any economic benefit related to the transfer of the animal.”  We have no idea if USDA means to include places like SF-SPCA or rescue groups under the Animal Welfare Act, but we are pretty certain that the editorial published in Pet Business clearly thinks that the time has come to regulate the not-for-profits involved in the pet world.

So, what do you think?  Should rescue groups and non-profits involved in animal rescue be regulated?

3 Responses to “Should the USDA Regulate Animal Shelters and Rescue Groups?”

  1. Pets Forever

    Hello Sir
    Thanks for sharing the great information. I read this blog and must say the information that you shared in this blog is really very useful. Please post more blog related to ” Pets Forever”. It would be really helpful for those people who want to share their best memories with pets.
    Thank You.

    Reply
  2. Viki

    YES, rescue groups and non-profits involved in animal rescue should be regulated. After all, most of them aren’t “rescues” at all, they’re “brokers” unless by definition that means they only take animals that are on Euthanasia lists at shelters, and they provide a life-saving haven for them. I’ve experienced rescues who treated animals worse than shelters do, they cage/crate them 23 1/2 hours per day, only provide the very minimum they have to such as neutering, then charge hundreds of dollars to sell them. SOMEONE needs to regulate them. They’ve been getting away with not paying taxes and not providing adequate care for way too long.

    Reply
  3. Anita Owens

    I learned from a shelter in Los Angeles that some of the best animals brought into the shelter were taken by these co-called rescues before the average person seeking a pet can see and choose the animal they may have otherwise chosen. There is some unscrupulous arrangement by the government run animal shelters to give private rescues first dibs on desirable pets. This is why you have so many rescues with desirable breeds or breed mixes while the local shelters have the less desirable breeds, like pit bulls. Then, once you contact a rescue, they want to gibe you the runaround and ask illegal questions like how old you are, or worse, disqualify you before arranging a home visit based on your zip code. In other words, they can and will discriminate, Something needs to be done about this. Breeders who this is going on, and that’s why the prices have skyrocketed for purebreds.

    Reply

Share Your Comments