I was reading an article in the Harvard Business Review (yup, nerd alert is going off now) titled When to Work with Rivals. The article provided a series of examples of competitors working together to address an issue and how businesses should decide when to work with a competitor. The article branded working with a competitor as “co-opetition.” The article was interesting (as much as any article in Harvard Business Review is) but I think when it comes to pet care the article was lacking. The article only focused on what was in it for the businesses to cooperate with each other. It never addressed if cooperation was good for the client of either company or the larger community. When it comes to pet care, we think this is a fatal flaw in the article’s analysis.
Pet Camp has always tried to have a good working relationship with other pet care facilities in San Francisco. Yes, we are competitors in providing overnight care for dogs and cats and doggie day care (among the other profit centers we all have), but we feel that cooperation is better not only for the individual pet care facilities but more importantly for San Francisco’s pets! Below are two reasons why.
Best Practices

Providing Options For San Francisco’s Cats and Dogs

We know that not every pet care facility in San Francisco operates with these thoughts in mind. To be honest, when Pet Camp was confronted with a new and larger competitor moving into San Francisco it took us a while to get comfortable working with them. In hindsight, we should have been more open minded and more focused on the end goal of ensuring the best care for San Francisco’s dogs and cats and less on our fear that they were going to put us out of business. We know that now, and will continue “co-opetition” with a focus on what’s best for pets, not just what’s best for Pet Camp.
Thanks for reading.